WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:05.200
Hi, you've made it to the Connextras video&nbsp;
where I explain what the heck is going on with&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:00:05.200 --> 00:00:10.720
these wires and all the stuff that I did with&nbsp;
this uh dehumidifier here. If you got here without&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:00:10.720 --> 00:00:15.520
seeing the main channel video, there's a clicky&nbsp;
thing. This is to explain an experiment that&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:00:15.520 --> 00:00:20.560
I ran on this thing uh and why it didn't work.&nbsp;
Well, I actually don't know why it didn't work,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:00:20.560 --> 00:00:26.880
but my idea did not pan out. So to give you&nbsp;
a quick recap of what that video is about,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:00:26.880 --> 00:00:32.720
that way you don't have to watch the whole thing&nbsp;
if you don't want to. This is a rotary desicant&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:00:32.720 --> 00:00:38.400
dehumidifier. And the cliffnotes version of how&nbsp;
it works is this rotate - this wheel of silica&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:00:38.400 --> 00:00:45.600
gel rotates very slowly. Air is drawn through the&nbsp;
whole wheel except for this beige section here. The&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:00:45.600 --> 00:00:52.240
beige section has a heating element which is getting&nbsp;
the wheel very hot so it releases the moisture.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:00:52.240 --> 00:00:58.640
Uh, and then that hot damp air goes through this&nbsp;
heat exchanger where it condenses into liquid and&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:00:58.640 --> 00:01:06.160
goes into a bucket. It's a clever idea, but it's&nbsp;
not very energy efficient. And I had this question&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:01:06.160 --> 00:01:14.640
in my head, which was "is this actually an&nbsp;
optimal amount of time for the silica gel to be uh&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:01:14.640 --> 00:01:21.920
charging versus regenerating?" The wheel rotates at&nbsp;
about one half of an RPM. It takes almost exactly 2&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:01:21.920 --> 00:01:28.160
minutes for it to rotate, which means it's exposed&nbsp;
to the room air for about 80 seconds and then it's&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:01:28.160 --> 00:01:36.080
recharged for about 40 seconds. And I was just not&nbsp;
entirely convinced that that was optimal. I had&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:01:36.080 --> 00:01:43.120
no idea how much, you know, moisture the silica&nbsp;
gel could reasonably be expected to adsorb in 80&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:01:43.120 --> 00:01:50.880
seconds, but I just wasn't convinced that that&nbsp;
was enough time. So, I got my uh you remember&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:01:50.880 --> 00:01:56.320
you may remember these temperature controllers&nbsp;
from the space heater... well not the space heater&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:01:56.320 --> 00:02:03.680
video the HVAC system sizing video and these&nbsp;
happen to have a duty cycle control mode. So,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:02:03.680 --> 00:02:10.880
I set one of these up to run for 4 minutes on&nbsp;
and then four minutes off. And I disconnected&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:02:10.880 --> 00:02:16.560
the wires from the heating element and the blower&nbsp;
motor that actually pushes air through here. And&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:02:16.560 --> 00:02:22.000
I'll explain my reasoning there. And I wired them&nbsp;
to a plug and plugged it into this. So, first I&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:02:22.000 --> 00:02:29.280
just did a preliminary test where I had it exactly&nbsp;
as you see it now, completely out of its case, but&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:02:29.280 --> 00:02:35.280
powered on and operating. It didn't seem to care&nbsp;
that I had disconnected the heater and the blower&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:02:35.280 --> 00:02:41.440
motor. It was working fine. Uh, and so this 12volt&nbsp;
fan was running, pulling air this way, but it was&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:02:41.440 --> 00:02:47.280
completely out of its case. And uh that meant the&nbsp;
airflow situation was not normal and there would&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:02:47.280 --> 00:02:53.680
be very little air flow to cool off the straw&nbsp;
radiator thing. So I literally just put a paint&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:02:53.680 --> 00:03:03.040
can here with a tiny little desk fan blowing at&nbsp;
this and um let it run for two hours as normal. In&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:03:03.040 --> 00:03:09.280
that time, it extracted 60 grams of water, which&nbsp;
was nowhere near what it can normally do. But that&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:03:09.280 --> 00:03:14.720
made sense because again, it's completely sitting&nbsp;
out like this. That's... so of course it's going to&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:03:14.720 --> 00:03:21.600
be a different number. So then I unplugged the uh&nbsp;
heating element thing from the wall and plugged&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:03:21.600 --> 00:03:26.640
it into my duty cycle controller, which turned&nbsp;
it on for 4 minutes and then turned it off for&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:03:26.640 --> 00:03:32.240
4 minutes. And my thinking was that's going to&nbsp;
make sure the desiccant wheel actually gets four&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:03:32.240 --> 00:03:38.640
minutes of exposure to the air before it starts&nbsp;
regenerating and then it will have four minutes&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:03:38.640 --> 00:03:46.640
of operation as this thing typically operates. And&nbsp;
I killed the blower motor on purpose thinking that&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:03:46.640 --> 00:03:54.000
um I would want to completely shut - like I would&nbsp;
want to stop the flow of hot air as quickly as&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:03:54.000 --> 00:04:00.080
possible and if this was continuing to go on&nbsp;
then the moisture that was in these tubes would&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:04:00.080 --> 00:04:04.720
potentially just get reabsorbed onto the desicant&nbsp;
as it was moving through. So it felt like it made&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:04:04.720 --> 00:04:12.240
sense to turn off both the heating element and&nbsp;
the little blower here. And surprise surprise,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:04:12.240 --> 00:04:18.960
despite the fact that I had cut the power draw in&nbsp;
half by turning the heating element, by running&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:04:18.960 --> 00:04:28.240
it at a 50% duty cycle, it extracted 70 grams&nbsp;
of water. So, it got more water out of the air&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:04:28.240 --> 00:04:35.120
with half power. And my mind at first was like,&nbsp;
"Eureka! This thing is put together poorly. Why&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:04:35.120 --> 00:04:41.200
didn't they design it differently?" But because my&nbsp;
brain understands the fundamentals of science, I&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:04:41.200 --> 00:04:48.080
changed way more than just one variable. So before&nbsp;
I concluded that that actually meant anything,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:04:48.080 --> 00:04:55.920
I needed to somehow get this back in its case&nbsp;
and do the experiment again. And that I actually&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:04:55.920 --> 00:05:01.280
filmed. The first one I I just took pictures of&nbsp;
the water readings, I think. Um and I actually&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:01.280 --> 00:05:12.080
filmed the setup of the second test. And then,&nbsp;
well, it didn't work. First, the thing broke.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:12.080 --> 00:05:20.000
It just wasn't It was suddenly beeping non-stop.&nbsp;
And what that very well might have been, uh, it&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:20.000 --> 00:05:26.560
has two temperature sensors in the heater circuit&nbsp;
thing um, to determine if it's overheating. And&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:26.560 --> 00:05:32.000
I thought they might be thermal switches, which&nbsp;
opened. They don't seem to be based on my testing&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:32.000 --> 00:05:37.920
with a voltmeter. So, I don't know if that's why&nbsp;
it died, but certainly what I was doing by killing&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:37.920 --> 00:05:42.000
the power to the heating element and the blower&nbsp;
at the same time, things were getting hotter than&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:42.000 --> 00:05:47.440
they should be.  When operating as normal, whenever&nbsp;
you turn this off, it keeps the fans running for&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:47.440 --> 00:05:54.080
like 30 seconds and then turns off. So, I knew I&nbsp;
was kind of asking for trouble. But regardless,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:54.080 --> 00:05:58.320
nothing actually broke. It's just the control&nbsp;
circuitry was was deciding I'm not going to work&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:05:58.320 --> 00:06:08.000
for you anymore. So I then had to wire the fan&nbsp;
to these wires here. That way I could run this&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06:08.000 --> 00:06:13.520
in completely manual operation. So I needed&nbsp;
to this wire is going was going to a second&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06:13.520 --> 00:06:21.440
plug. This was going to a DC power supply to&nbsp;
run the fan. And then the plug oops the plug&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06:21.440 --> 00:06:28.320
that I had already wired to here the heating&nbsp;
element and the blower went into this thing.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06:29.280 --> 00:06:34.000
Well, and the wall originally. So, I repeated&nbsp;
the tests with it fully powered on as normal,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06:34.000 --> 00:06:41.680
just the control circuitry was not awake for any&nbsp;
of this. And I think uh hold on, I wrote this down&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06:41.680 --> 00:06:46.880
somewhere. So, once it was reassembled with the&nbsp;
wires poking out carefully and having everything&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06:46.880 --> 00:06:57.040
running as it should, it extracted 159 g of water&nbsp;
in 2 hours, which is pretty typical. And then I&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:06:57.040 --> 00:07:09.280
plugged the heating element and blower into this&nbsp;
and it extracted 74 grams of water. So it's Yeah,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:07:09.280 --> 00:07:14.160
I was pretty bummed when that happened because&nbsp;
I really thought that I had stumbled upon like&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:07:14.160 --> 00:07:20.320
there's something because this thing just runs&nbsp;
the heating element at full power uh in the high&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:07:20.320 --> 00:07:28.160
span highspeed mode. High fan speed mode. That's&nbsp;
what I meant. It runs in full the heating element&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:07:28.160 --> 00:07:36.000
is just on if you have this in its maximum power&nbsp;
mode and that just didn't seem right. It or it&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:07:36.000 --> 00:07:42.880
seemed like that might not be right, but it's&nbsp;
right. So, the experiment was a failure. Um&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:07:42.880 --> 00:07:48.960
80 seconds appears to be just as much time as&nbsp;
required for this to uh adsorb as much moisture&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:07:48.960 --> 00:07:55.120
as it can hold on to. And you know, in hindsight,&nbsp;
that makes that kind of makes sense. I mean, it's&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:07:55.120 --> 00:08:01.920
it's not like this can actually hold on to much&nbsp;
moisture at all. Um, but you're not you never see&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:08:01.920 --> 00:08:09.040
it wet. That's not how this works. It's just um&nbsp;
I mean on the molecular level, I couldn't tell I&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:08:09.040 --> 00:08:13.680
couldn't tell you what's happening, but molecules&nbsp;
of water are sticking to the silica gel and then&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:08:13.680 --> 00:08:21.520
they're being able to pushed out from the other&nbsp;
thing. Um, but the 80 seconds in the airirstream&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:08:21.520 --> 00:08:27.040
and then 40 seconds in the hot airirstream&nbsp;
appears to be pretty close to ideal. So,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:08:27.040 --> 00:08:33.840
I have no idea what happened when I tested it the&nbsp;
first time, why it was able to get more moisture,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:08:33.840 --> 00:08:41.449
but um I'm guessing that was just a fluke because&nbsp;
it it it was only a small...

00:08:41.449 --> 00:08:49.440
Well, the other thing it could be is um when this is running at half power,&nbsp;it does cut the power to the heating element in&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:08:49.440 --> 00:08:54.000
half. I shouldn't I shouldn't say half power.&nbsp;
In the night mode, I think is what it calls it,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:08:54.000 --> 00:08:59.680
the heating the power draw drops to about 150&nbsp;
watts. So, when it slows down the air flow,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:08:59.680 --> 00:09:10.240
it also slows down the heating or it lowers the&nbsp;
heating power. So, I guess effectively because&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:09:10.240 --> 00:09:16.640
the air flow was messed up in my situation, I was&nbsp;
doing the same thing with the heating element,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:09:16.640 --> 00:09:25.040
cutting it down to half power, but I was doing it&nbsp;
uh through a duty cycle through timing rather than&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:09:25.040 --> 00:09:31.440
actually lowering the power power level if that&nbsp;
makes sense. Um yeah, so this is just kind of a&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:09:31.440 --> 00:09:37.200
bit of a rambly quick like what quick explanation&nbsp;
of what I was doing. I I I had started to write&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:09:37.200 --> 00:09:42.000
I had a section in the script where I explained&nbsp;
this experiment, but then I realized this doesn't&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:09:42.000 --> 00:09:46.640
it doesn't do anything. It was just me making it&nbsp;
was just an excuse to make fun of the people who&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:09:46.640 --> 00:09:54.284
put this together, but they did nothing wrong.&nbsp;
So, yep. That's all there is to this video.

00:09:54.284 --> 00:09:54.784
Bye!

